Active Working Groups

Active Working Groups

Eurachem currently has the following active working groups:

Sampling Uncertainty Working Group

Terms of Reference

  1. Sampling at micro scale - indentation from micro-beam samplerThe Eurachem Sampling Uncertainty Working Group operates in accordance with the Constitution agreed in the Eurachem Memorandum of Understanding.
  2. The Eurachem Sampling Uncertainty Working Group will prepare guidance for the evaluation of uncertainties in measurement arising from the process of sampling. This guidance will be applicable to all chemical measurements that require the taking of a sample. It will provide guidance on the assessment of the uncertainty of the measurement that is caused by the process of sampling, and any physical preparation of the sample prior to analysis, and how this can be combined with estimates of uncertainty arising from the analytical process.
  3. These guides will be developed in collaboration with relevant international bodies  and will be updated as experience is gained in their use.

 

Activities

W plan 250x184The UfS working group is currently working to promote the Eurachem Guide "Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling" (below) and is developing a number of information leaflets related to sampling uncertainty. The WG has also acted as the scientific committee for Eurachem workshops on sampling, and  collaborates with other working groups to promote best practice in sampling.  In addition, members of the group  contribute to communication and debate on this subject through conferences and publications, and via contributions to consultations on regulatory documents.

 

In addition, a Joint Task Group (JTG) has been set up between the Sampling Uncertainty WG and the Method Validation WG, with input from Eurolab and NMKL, to prepare Supplementary Guidance on the Validation of Measurement Procedures that Include Sampling (VaMPIS). Initial discussions within the JTG have focused on the balance between the quantitative and descriptive approach, and also between the integrated and isolated approach. A Discussion Forum, joint with Eurolab, was held online on 4th May 2022 to engage with the wider user community and attracted 450 participants.

Members

  • Mike Ramsey - University of Sussex & RSC AMC (Chair) (Eurachem)
  • Steve Ellison - Eurachem & AMC (Secretary) (Eurachem)
  • Achilleas Iakovakis -Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Greece
  • Ilya Kuselman - Independent Consultant on Metrology, Israel (CITAC)
  • Alex Williams - UK (Eurachem)
  • Bertil Magnusson - RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Sweden (Eurachem, Nordtest)
  • Fernando Cordeiro Raposo - Portugal
  • Peter Rostron - RSC AMC, UK (Eurachem)
  • Irache Visiers - Applus (EUROLAB)
  • Jorge Eduardo Sarkis - Institute of Nuclear and Energy Research, Brazil (CITAC)
  • Paolo de Zorzi - APAT; Environment Agency, Italy
  • Roger Wood - RSC AMC (UK)
  • Eskil Sahlin - RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (Eurachem Sweden)
  • Pentti Minkkinen* - Lappeenranta University of Technology
  • Silke Richter - BAM, Germany (Eurachem)
  • Vassilis Zonaras - Department of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Greece

Outputs

Publications

UfS Guide coverThe working group has published the second edition of the Eurachem Guide Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling (2019).

The second edition of the Guide added several new features, including provisions for handling the large relative uncertainty common in sampling by use of uncertainty factors, and more economical designs for sampling uncertainty studies.

The group has also published an information leaflet on the Uncertainty Factor.

Workshops

 

Collaborative activities

The working group works closely with other groups interested in sampling, in particular the UK Royal Society of Chemistry Analytical Methods Committee (AMC). Particularly relevant outputs related to the Eurachem Sampling Uncertainty guide are the following sampling-related Technical Briefs produced by the AMC Sampling sub-committee:

  1. Terminology - the key to understanding analytical science. Part 2: Sampling and sample preparation (2005) Technical Brief 19 of the Analytical Methods Committee (ISSN 1757- 5958)
  2. Analytical and sampling strategy, fitness for purpose, and computer games (2005) Technical Brief 20 of the Analytical Methods Committee (ISSN 1757- 5958)
  3. Optimising your uncertainty - a case study (2008) Technical Brief 32 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  4. Measurement Uncertainty arising from sampling: the new Eurachem Guide (2008) Technical Brief 31 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  5. What is uncertainty from sampling, and why is it important? (2008) Technical Brief 16A of the Analytical Methods Committee
  6. The Duplicate Method for the estimation of measurement uncertainty arising from sampling (2009)Technical Brief 40 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  7. The importance, for regulation, of uncertainty from sampling (2009) Technical Brief 42 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  8. Quality Control of routine sampling in chemical analysis (2012) Technical Brief 51 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  9. Estimating sampling uncertainty – how many duplicate samples are needed? (2014) Technical Brief 58 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  10. Random samples (2014) Technical Brief 60 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  11. Unbalanced robust ANOVA for the estimation of measurement uncertainty at reduced cost (2014) Technical Brief 64 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  12. Sampling theory and sampling uncertainty (2015) Technical Brief 71 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  13. Representative sampling? Views from a regulator and a measurement scientist (2016) Technical Brief 73 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  14. Proficiency testing of sampling (2017) Technical Brief 78 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  15. Beam sampling: taking samples at the micro-scale (2018) Technical Brief 84 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  16. Why do we need the uncertainty factor? (2019) Technical Brief 88 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  17. The role of accreditation in ensuring sampling quality (2019) Technical Brief 90 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  18. What’s novel in the new Eurachem guide on uncertainty from sampling? (2019) Technical Brief 96 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  19. How reliable is my uncertainty estimate? (2021) Technical Brief 105 of the Analytical Methods Committee
  20. Comparing measurement uncertainty values (2022) Technical Brief 112 of the Analytical Methods Committee

These are all available on the RSC AMC Technical Briefs page.

 

Qualitative Analysis Working Group

Introduction

At the Eurachem/CITAC workshop Measurement uncertainty and traceability: meeting the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025  in Lucerne, June 2002, a workshop session was held on the topic of uncertainty in qualitative analysis and testing. That workshop recommended the formation of a new Eurachem working group to provide guidance on the topic, based on the discussion paper presented at that meeting. The following constitutes the Terms of Reference for the working group.

Terms of reference

Name

The group shall be known as the Qualitative Analysis Working Group.

Aims

The working group shall:
- Prepare guidance on the assessment and expression of uncertainty in qualitative analysis and testing.
- Arrange for appropriate publication and promotion of the above guidance.

Operation

The working group shall operate as a working group of Eurachem. The chair shall report to the Eurachem executive and the guidance shall be subject to the approval of the Eurachem General Assembly.
The working group shall cooperate with and invite participation from CITAC and from other organisations as appropriate, subject to approval by the Eurachem executive.

Membership

1. Members of the working group may be:
a) nominated by national Eurachem organisations.
b) appointed by participating organisations including CITAC.
2. Organisations wishing to be aware of the work but not to participate directly may, subject to approval by the Eurachem Executive, participate as Observers by nomination of a contact for correspondence.

Copyright

Copyright in any guidance produced shall be held jointly and severally by the contributors who shall permit publication, reproduction or quotation of the guidance in whole or in part by any member of Eurachem or CITAC and by other organisations at the discretion of the Eurachem Executive.

 

Members*

  • R Bettencourt da Silva (PT) (Chair)
  • S Ellison (UK) (Secretary)
  • A Botha (CITAC)
  • H Emons (EU)
  • D Ivanova (BG)
  • R Kaus (DE)
  • I Kuselman (CITAC) (Observer)
  • S Lardy-Fontan (FR)
  • O Levbarg (UA)
  • I Leito (EE)
  • K Matveinen (FI)
  • O Pellegrino (PT)
  • P Pereira (PT)
  • P Saunders (IE)
  • M Sega (IT)
  • E Theodorsson (SE)
  • A Togola (FR)
  • E Totu (RO)
  • W Wegscheider (AT)

 * Current members; last updated August 2022

Guidance documents

The working group published the Eurachem Guide "Assessment of performance and uncertainty in qualitative chemical analysis" in 2021.

Work programme

The Eurachem working group started working on uncertainty issues in qualitative analysis in response to early concerns about the implementation of measurement uncertainty under ISO 17025 accreditation. Eurachem published a policy paper on the subject in 2000 [1]. At the Eurachem/CITAC workshop Measurement uncertainty and traceability: meeting the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025  in Lucerne, June 2002, a workshop session was held on the topic. That workshop recommended the formation of a new Eurachem Qualitative Analysis Working Group  to provide guidance on the topic, based on a discussion paper presented at that meeting. The group met first in May 2003, and works in cooperation with CITAC. It is currently working on the topic of the assessment and expression of uncertainty in qualitative analysis and testing. The aim is to provide guidance on issues such as:

  • The effort required to obtain sufficiently reliable false response rates (the most common basis for assessing the reliability of qualitative tests);
  • methods of determining false response rates, including experimental methods, methods based on databases, and prediction of false response rates from the performance of quantitative methods used in the testing process;
  • practical methods of expressing the performance of methods, including guidance on the wide range of different terminology in use.


[1] Ellison SLR, Accred. Qual. Assur. 2000, 5, 346-348

Past activities

 

Education and Training Working Group

Terms of Reference

  1. The Eurachem Education and Training Working Group (ETWG) has been established and will operate in accordance with the Constitution agreed in the Eurachem Memorandum of Understanding.
  2. The ETWG will attempt to have representatives from each of the Eurachem member countries either as Full Members or as Corresponding Members*.
  3. The ETWG, in accordance with Eurachem policy on Establishment and Operation of Eurachem Working Groups, will appoint a Chair who will serve for a period of 3 years. A Vice-Chair/Secretary will also be appointed by the Working Group to serve for a period of 3 years. Both the Chair and Vice-Chair can be reappointed on completion of their term.
  4. The ETWG will promote the concepts and importance of quality in analytical measurement with a particular focus on the development of guidance on quality management which emphasises metrology.
  5. The ETWG will organise workshops and training events on metrology in chemistry and related quality assurance issues. Members will report on these activities at least annually.
  6. In collaboration with the other Working Groups, the ETWG will regularly review and publish on the Eurachem website a Reading List of references relating to quality assurance for analytical science.
  7. The ETWG will collaborate with other organisations having similar or complementary aims.
  8. The ETWG will meet at least annually, usually at the General Assembly and review progress of projects against the work programme.

* Full members agree to attend meetings and carry out tasks agreed at the annual Working Group meeting

Corresponding members agree to comment on draft papers sent out to the Working Group

Members

Country Member Country Member
Austria W Kandler* Portugal A Mosca
Austria T Prohaska Romania E Eftimie Totu
Austria A Rachetti Russia V Baranovskaya*
Austria W Wegscheider* Slovakia D Kordik*
Cyprus  K Tsimilis Spain P Morillas Bravo
Czech Republic D Milde Türkiye M Bilsel*
Georgia N Manvelidze* Türkiye O Cankur
Germany M Koch Türkiye P Yolci Ömeroglu
Italy E Gregory United Kingdom V Barwick (Chair)
Italy M Patriarca United Kingdom E Prichard*
Norway E Gjengedal* United Kingdom E Sanchez (Vice-Chair/Sectretary)
Poland E Bulska*    

*Corresponding member

 

Activities

Current

1. Collate and evaluate information on the state of education and training in analytical science in different member countries, with a particular focus on the development of teaching and training materials on quality management which emphasise metrology.

2. Engage with working analytical scientists, experts and other international organisations to contribute to the development of internationally harmonised terminology for analytical chemistry.

3. Contribute to the development and delivery of education and training in chemical metrology and quality assurance for both analytical scientists and the broader community by producing freely available materials. Current activities are:

3. In collaboration with other WGs, prepare short videos for the Eurachem YouTube channel to address and explain challenging topics in the field of metrology in chemistry.

4. Organise workshops in metrology in chemistry which bring together academic staff, industrial scientists, instrument manufacturers and students.

Specific projects in each area will be agreed at the Working Group meetings. Each work package will have a group of members identified in the Minutes to carry the project forward.

 

Past

Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability Working Group

This is a joint WG with CITAC.

Terms of Reference

  1. The EURACHEM/CITAC Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability Working Group has been established and will operate in accordance with the Constitution agreed in the EURACHEM Memorandum of Understanding.
  2. The EURACHEM/CITAC Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability Working Group will prepare guidance for the evaluation of uncertainties and establishment of traceability in chemical analysis. This guidance will be applicable to all chemical analytical laboratories and will provide guidance on the assessment of uncertainties and establishment of traceability required for accreditation.
  3. These guides will be developed in collaboration with EA and will be updated as experience is gained in their use.

Work Programme

Guides

Information leaflets

The working group has so far published five information leaflets:

In addition, the WG maintains the leaflet Measurement Uncertainty for Laboratory Customers, originally published by SP (now RISE) and elaborated with Eurolab and others to help customers understand why laboratories report measurement uncertainty.

Workshops

The Measurement Uncertainty and traceability working group has coordinated several International workshops on measurement uncertainty, including

  • Evaluation of measurement uncertainty (Graz, 1994; Berlin, 1997, Lisbon, 2011)
  • Measurement Uncertainty in Sampling and Compliance (Berlin, 2008)
  • Eurachem Workshop: Quality in Analytical Measurements (Lisbon, 2014)
  • Eurachem workshop on Uncertainty from sampling and analysis for accredited laboratories (Berlin, 2019)

 

Members*

Organisation  Country Member
EURACHEM Armenia K Darbinyan
  Austria W Wegscheider
  Belgium P Thomas
  Bulgaria D Ivanova
  Finland T Naykki
  Denmark A Svaneborg
  Estonia I Leito
  Germany R Becker
  Germany M Melzer
  Greece V Zonaras
  Ireland É Christie
  Italy F Rolle
  JRC (EC) P Robouch (Observer)
  Portugal R Bettencourt da Silva
  Portugal O Pellegrino
  Poland A Brzyski
  Slovenia M Inkret
  Spain P Morillas
  Sweden B Magnusson (Secretary)
  Sweden E Sahlin
  Switzerland M Rösslein
  The Netherlands A van der Veen
  The Netherlands R Kaarls (Observer)
  Türkiye P Yolci
  United Kingdom S Ellison (Chair)
  United Kingdom A Williams
  United Kingdom R Wood
  Ukraine O Levbarg
  Ukraine D Leontiev
     
CITAC Israel I Kuselman (Observer)
  Brazil Felipe Rebello Lourenço
  Italy F Pennecchi

*Last updated 2022-05-06

Contact

The working group may be contacted via the working group Secretary using the Website contact form.