Events listings

Current Eurachem Guides

The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods (2014)

Full title

The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods: A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics: Second edition (2014)

Quick links:

Introduction

Frontcover Validation Guide 90

This guide was first issued in 1998, and has over the years been one of the most popular of the Eurachem guides. Since the release of the first edition, however, there have been many changes in terminology, working practices, reference documents and requirements. This second edition, produced by the Eurachem Method Validation Working Group, forms a thorough revision of the 1998 edition.

This second edition accommodates the main changes in international standards and practice. The new edition also includes notes on some aspects of validation that are specific to qualitative test methods.

Contents

This second edition includes guidance on:

  • The concept of method validation;
  • The background and rationale for method validation;
  • How a method validation study should be performed and how much should be done (validation/verification);
  • A thorough explanation of the various validation parameters (performance characteristics);
  • Follow-up on the validation study (reporting, use of performance data in Internal Quality Control);
  • Documentation of analytical methods.

MetValFlow

Appendices also describe the statistical basis of detection limits and analysis of variance for precision studies, and add notes on qualitative analysis.

In preparing this guidance, the Working Group has aimed at the right balance between giving a solid theoretical background for method validation studies and providing practical guidelines on how to plan, perform and evaluate such studies in the laboratories.

The approach is generic in the sense that the Guide does not focus on particular fields of application (food, environment, pharmaceuticals etc.). However, the guide includes references to a number of specific guides in fields where different practices have been developed and become common.

The guide also includes a full bibliography. Further literature references on method validation can be found in the section "Validation of analytical methods" in the Reading list on this website.

Availability

The Guide is available from this website in the following languages:

In addition:

*Italian version also available at http://www.iss.it/binary/publ/cont/16_39_web.pdf

Citation

This publication should be cited* as:
"B. Magnusson and U. Örnemark (eds.) Eurachem Guide: The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods – A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics, (2nd ed. 2014). ISBN 978-91-87461-59-0. Available from http://www.eurachem.org"

*Subject to journal requirements

Supplementary guidance

The supplementary guidance below gives additional guidance on method validation topics:

  • Planning and reporting method validation studies. This supplement is in the form of a template which can be used to assist with planning the evaluation of the chosen performance characteristics
  • Blanks in method validation. This short supplement describes the different types of blanks which may be used during method validation and provides guidance for situations where it may be difficult to obtain a suitable blank matrix.

Translations

Translation into other languages is permitted for members of Eurachem. Other offers of translation should be directed to the Eurachem Secretariat for permission. The Eurachem policy on maintenance and development of Eurachem guidance, available on the Policies page, gives further information on translation.

Review/revision of the guide

The MVWG has started the process of reviewing the 2nd version (2014) of the guide with regard to a revision into a 3rd version.

The MVWG is always interested in feed-back from users of the guide, who are welcome to make their comments by use of the Feedback form on the Eurachem Fitness for Purpose guide (opens on another site)

Previous version

The 1998 edition of this guide can be found here for reference.

 

Planning and Reporting Method Validation Studies

A Supplement to the Eurachem Guide "The Fitness for Purpose of
Analytical Methods"

Contents

Cover of mehod validation 'Planning' supplementPlanning is an essential stage in the validation process. Before starting any experimental work, the aim should be to have a clear plan for the entire validation study. This should cover the performance characteristics that will be studied, the target value for each performance characteristic, the materials that will be analysed, the level of replication and order of the experiments, any statistical analysis that will be used, and how the method will be judged as being fit for purpose.

This supplement provides guidance on the planning and reporting of validation studies. The document is structured in the form of a template which can be used to assist with planning the evaluation of the chosen performance characteristics. The template is structured such that once the experimental work has been completed, the document can be easily converted into a validation report. The supplement also contains a checklist to assist with validation planning.

This supplement is intended to be used in conjunction with "The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods - A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics (2nd ed.)"

Availability

This supplementary guidance is available in the following languages:

* Italian translation includes "Blanks in method validation" supplement

Citation

This publication should be cited* as:
“V. Barwick (ed.), Planning and Reporting Method Validation Studies – Supplement to Eurachem Guide on the Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods (2019). Available from http://www.eurachem.org"

*Subject to journal requirements

Translations

Translation into other languages is permitted for members of Eurachem. Other offers of translation should be directed to the Eurachem Secretariat for permission. The Eurachem policy on maintenance and development of Eurachem guidance, available on the Policies page, gives further information on translation.

Assessment of performance and uncertainty in qualitative chemical analysis

Introduction

Mass spectrometric identification of pesticide in lettuceMany decisions with socio-economic or individual impact depend on qualitative analysis, including decisions related to food safety, clinical diagnosis, and forensic evidence, are based primarily on qualitative, rather than quantitative, chemical analysis. Qualitative analysis is analysis that returns a classification rather than a numerical value, such as the identity of a chemical substance, the type of plastic of a microparticle, the potential source of an oil spill, the presence of a banned sports doping substance, or the presence of accelerant in fire debris. Sometimes, such classifications rely solely on qualitative tests; others may use measurement results (such as line frequencies in a spectrum) to reach a conclusion.

Qualitative analysis, like quantitative analysis, needs to be demonstrably reliable. Part of the purpose of the guide is accordingly to show how the performance of a qualitative analysis procedure can be quantified to ensure its fitness for purpose. Practical difficulties and limitations in reliable quantification of low false result rates are discussed, and recommendations are made for checking the validity of these analyses. Brief recommendations are also made for ensuring that any measurements undertaken in the course of a qualitative analysis are reliable.

Although laboratories accredited following the ISO/IEC 17025 standard are not currently required to express qualitative analysis results with uncertainty, the guide provides some metrics that can be used to convey the level of confidence in conclusions from qualitative analysis. In addition, the guide provides suggestions for reporting results with an indication of confidence if desired. 

This guide does not make recommendations on whether or not laboratories should routinely report information on the confidence, or uncertainty, associated with qualitative analysis results. Nevertheless, an understanding of performance, or of the uncertainty associated with a qualitative analysis result, can help laboratories to better advise customers; it can also help to identify quality improvements or determine (for example) whether additional confirmatory tests might be needed.

This Eurachem/CITAC guide accordingly aims to provide some tools to help improve the quality of qualitative analysis and of their interpretation, to make sure that interests dependent on these analyses are well protected.

Content of the guide

This guide includes information on 

  • The nature and relevance of qualitative analysis.
  • Different types of qualitative analysis - for example, those that depend on qualitative tests alone, and others that use quantitative information to come to a conclusion.
  • Experimental and other strategies for estimating false response rates, which are fundamental to establishing reliability.
  • Expressions of confidence in qualitative analysis.
  • Reporting qualitative analysis results.
  • Examples showing how false response rates and other metrics can be determined.
  • The statistical basis for some important measures of confidence in a qualitative result.

 

Availability

The guide may be downloaded from this website at no cost.

* First published 2021-11-11. Publication dates above are dates of file publication on this website.

Translation

Translation into other languages is permitted for members of Eurachem. Other offers of translation should be directed to the Eurachem Secretariat for permission. The Eurachem policy on maintenance and development of Eurachem guidance, available on the Policies page, gives further information on translation.

Citation

This guidance should be cited* as
"R Bettencourt da Silva and S L R Ellison (eds.) Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Assessment of performance and uncertainty in qualitative chemical analysis. First Edition, Eurachem (2021). ISBN 978-0-948926-39-6.
Available from www.eurachem.org."

*Subject to journal requirements.

Previous editions

There are no earlier editions of this Guide.

Blanks in method validation

A Supplement to the Eurachem Guide "The Fitness for Purpose of
Analytical Methods"

Contents

Cover of 'blanks' supplementBlanks are an important tool and are used in the determination of most performance characteristics during a validation process. They are also often included in each analytical run during routine use of the measurement procedure. There are many different types of blanks and the analyst must consider which blanks to include during preparation of the validation plan.

The aim of this supplement is to describe the different types of blanks which may be used during method validation and to provide guidance for situations where it may be difficult to obtain a suitable blank matrix. It is intended to be used in conjunction with "The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods - A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics (2nd ed.)"

Availability

This supplementary guidance is available in the following languages:

* Italian translation includes "Planning and Reporting Method Validation Studies" supplement

Citation

This publication should be cited* as:
"H. Cantwell (ed.) Blanks in Method Validation - Supplement to Eurachem Guide The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods, (1st ed. 2019). Available from http://www.eurachem.org"

*Subject to journal requirements

Translations

Translation into other languages is permitted for members of Eurachem. Other offers of translation should be directed to the Eurachem Secretariat for permission. The Eurachem policy on maintenance and development of Eurachem guidance, available on the Policies page, gives further information on translation.

Metrological Traceability in Chemical Measurement - 2nd Edition (2019)

Contents

TrcFig2ttl 366x215This Guide gives detailed guidance for the establishment of metrological traceability in quantitative chemical analysis, based on the definition in the international vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (VIM). Though it is aimed principally at testing and measurement laboratories carrying out chemical measurement, the principles are expected to apply from routine analysis to basic research. The document is intended to assist laboratories in meeting the requirements on traceability of results given in ISO/IEC 17025.

This second edition amends the Guide to reflect revised terminology introduced in the third edition of the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM). Detailed discussion of the VIM terminology can be found in the Eurachem Guide “Terminology in Analytical Measurement: Introduction to VIM 3”.

Availability

You may download the guide directly from this website at no cost.

A Czech translation of the 2nd edition is also available as a part of the Eurachem.CZ guide "KVALIMETRIE 24", available at http://www.eurachem.cz/publikace-detail.php?clanek=18

Citation

This publication should be cited as follows*:

S L R Ellison and A Williams (Eds) Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Metrological traceability in chemical measurement
(2nd ed. 2019). ISBN: 978-0-948926-34-1. Available from www.eurachem.org.

*Subject to journal requirements

Translation

Translation into other languages is permitted for members of Eurachem. Other offers of translation should be directed to the Eurachem Secretariat for permission. The Eurachem policy on maintenance and development of Eurachem guidance, available on the Policies page, gives further information on translation.